<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madison&#8217;s Red Herring Special</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adaptistration.com/2009/02/06/madisons-red-herring-special/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adaptistration.com/2009/02/06/madisons-red-herring-special/</link>
	<description>Drew McManus on the orchestra business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:01:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Foley</title>
		<link>http://www.adaptistration.com/2009/02/06/madisons-red-herring-special/comment-page-1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adaptistration.com/?p=3622#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>The WCO musicians&#039; decision to continue asking for supplemental insurance is a wise one, as instruments are often mangled during the traveling process on tours (ever seen a crushed tuba?) and, after all, the musicians&#039; instruments are being moved at the employer&#039;s behest as part of their outreach activities. 

This is my guess--the supplemental insurance issue may be part of a bid on the WCO&#039;s part to do away with the past practice clause (or portions of it) in their proposal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WCO musicians&#8217; decision to continue asking for supplemental insurance is a wise one, as instruments are often mangled during the traveling process on tours (ever seen a crushed tuba?) and, after all, the musicians&#8217; instruments are being moved at the employer&#8217;s behest as part of their outreach activities. </p>
<p>This is my guess&#8211;the supplemental insurance issue may be part of a bid on the WCO&#8217;s part to do away with the past practice clause (or portions of it) in their proposal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
